Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Perinatol. 2009 May;29 Suppl 2:S23-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.26.

Synthetic surfactants: where are we? Evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Author information

1
Department of Neonatology, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC 28402-9025, USA. Fernando.moya@seahec.net

Abstract

The benefits of exogenous synthetic or animal-derived surfactants for prevention or treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) are well established. Data from head-to-head trials comparing animal-derived surfactants primarily with the synthetic surfactant colfosceril suggest that the major clinical advantages afforded by the presence of surfactant protein (SP)-B and SP-C in animal-derived preparations relate to faster onset of action, a reduction in the incidence of RDS when used prophylactically, and a lower incidence of air leaks and RDS-related deaths. However, no benefits in terms of overall mortality or BPD have been shown in these head-to-head comparisons. Findings from trials of a new-generation synthetic surfactant containing a peptide that mimics SP-B, as well as their follow-up study suggest that its administration improves short-term clinical outcomes compared with colfosceril and results in survival through 1 year of age, which is at least comparable, if not perhaps superior, to that seen with animal-derived surfactants.

PMID:
19399006
DOI:
10.1038/jp.2009.26
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Publication types, MeSH terms, Substances

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center