Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2008 Dec;5(4):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

Current indications and future perspective of fluorescence bronchoscopy: a review study.

Author information

1
The Yorkshire Laser Centre, Goole & District Hospital, East Yorkshire, Goole, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) was introduced into clinical practice early in the 1990s for identification and localisation of intra-epithelial pre-neoplastic (dysplastic mucosa) and early neoplastic (carcinoma in situ) endobronchial lesions.

OBJECTIVES:

to determine the current range of indications of AFB through review of published literature and to compare sensitivity and specificity of AFB with those of WLB for identification of pre- and early neoplastic lesions in each of the indications.

METHOD:

Search of the literature produced 62 eligible articles for the review. These were "empirically" classified into five categories: 1. AFB for identification and localisation of early neoplastic changes. 2. AFB for identification and localisation of bronchial neoplastic changes in smokers. 3. AFB for monitoring treatment and surveillance of early neoplastic changes. 4. AFB for identification and localisation of synchronous and multi-focal lesions. 5. AFB used as a tool for lung cancer screening.

RESULTS:

In all categories the sensitivity of AFB was several times greater than WLB in identifying pre-neoplastic and early neoplastic lesions and the specificity of WLB was higher than that of AFB. When AFB was used for identification and localisation of dysplasia and carcinoma in situ its sensitivity was 25-47% (mean 33%) higher than that of WLB. Its specificity was 7-18% (mean 11%) lower than WLB. The ratio of sensitivity of AFB/WLB was highest in every category when the population tested comprised a higher proportion of pre- and early neoplastic lesions than invasive cancer. In such cases there was relatively lower specificity for AFB compared to WLB.

CONCLUSION:

The review suggests that AFB should be included in routine investigations of patients suspected of having lung cancer, those undergoing lung cancer surgery and in post-treatment follow-up to discover early cancer and/or recurrence. Also, it has to be included in any screening programme protocol.

PMID:
19356663
DOI:
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2009.01.008
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center