Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 May;41(5):1138-45. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318192ce58.

Training surface and intensity: inflammation, hemolysis, and hepcidin expression.

Author information

1
School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia. peelip01@student.uwa.edu.au

Abstract

PURPOSE:

This investigation assessed the effects of training intensity and ground surface type on hemolysis, inflammation, and hepcidin activity during running.

METHODS:

Ten highly trained male endurance athletes completed a graded exercise test, two continuous 10-km runs on a grass (GRASS) and a bitumen road surface (ROAD) at 75%-80% peak VO2 running velocity, and a 10 x 1-km interval running session (INT) at 90%-95% of the peak VO2 running velocity. Venous blood and urine samples were collected before, immediately after, and at 3 and 24 h after exercise. Serum samples were analyzed for circulating levels of IL-6, free hemoglobin (Hb), haptoglobin (Hp), iron, and ferritin. Urine samples were analyzed for changes in hepcidin expression.

RESULTS:

After running, the IL-6 and free Hb were significantly greater, and serum Hp was significantly lower than preexercise values in all three conditions (P < 0.05). Furthermore, IL-6 levels and the change in free Hb from baseline were significantly greater in the INT compared with those in the GRASS (P < 0.05). There were no differences between the GRASS and ROAD training surfaces (P > 0.05). Serum iron and ferritin were significantly increased after exercise in all three conditions (P < 0.05) but were not different between trials.

CONCLUSION:

Greater running intensities incur more inflammation and hemolysis, but these variables were not affected by the surface type trained upon.

PMID:
19346972
DOI:
10.1249/MSS.0b013e318192ce58
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center