Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Genetica. 2010 Jan;138(1):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s10709-009-9358-y.

Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions.

Author information

1
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, and Escuela de BiologĂ­a, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria, San Pedro, Costa Rica. william.eberhard@gmail.com

Abstract

Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain why male intromittent genitalia consistently tend to diverge more rapidly than other body traits of the same individuals in a wide range of animal taxa. Currently the two most popular involve sexual selection: sexually antagonistic coevolution (SAC) and cryptic female choice (CFC). A review of the most extensive attempts to discriminate between these two hypotheses indicates that SAC is not likely to have played a major role in explaining this pattern of genital evolution. Promising lines for future, more direct tests of CFC include experimental modification of male genital form and female sensory abilities, analysis of possible male-female dialogues during copulation, and direct observations of genital behavior.

PMID:
19308664
DOI:
10.1007/s10709-009-9358-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center