Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Digestion. 2009;79(2):92-7. doi: 10.1159/000207808. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

Percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy and jejunal extension tube through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective analysis of success, complications and outcome.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Ulmenweg 18, DE-91054 Erlangen, Germany. yurdaguel.zopf@uk-erlangen.de

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Percutaneous access to the jejunum is an important approach if gastrostomy feeding is not possible.

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze success, short- and long-term complications (STCs, LTCs) in patients with percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) and jejunal access through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (Jet-PEG).

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of endoscopically placed PEJs and Jet-PEGs. Success rates, mortality, STCs and LTCs were investigated for risk factors comprising demographic data, underlying disease, previous surgery and experience of the endoscopist.

RESULTS:

205 PEJ and 58 Jet-PEG placements were included in the study. PEJs and Jet-PEGs were successfully placed in 65.4 and 89.7%, respectively. Billroth II surgery predisposed in favor of a significantly higher success rate for PEJ placement (p = 0.014, OR = 2.27). Inexperienced examiners have a significantly (p = 0.040) lower success rate for tube insertion than examiners with a medium level of experience. STCs and LTCs occurred evenly in PEJ and Jet-PEG patients. Dislocation of the tube occurred significantly more frequently in Jet-PEG patients (33.3%, p = 0.005). Aspiration was most common for bedridden patients.

CONCLUSION:

PEJ has a significantly lower success rate for insertions, but fewer LTCs. The experience of the endoscopist correlates with the success rate of tube insertion.

PMID:
19279384
DOI:
10.1159/000207808
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for S. Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland
Loading ...
Support Center