Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;39(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

Effects of vein width and depth on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous success rates.

Author information

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Increasing numbers of operators are learning to use ultrasound to guide peripheral intravenous (i.v.) catheter insertion in patients with difficult access. Unfortunately, failed cutaneous punctures are common. Some veins seen on ultrasound may be better choices than others.

OBJECTIVES:

To estimate the effects of vein width and depth on the probability of success in ultrasound-guided i.v. catheter insertion.

METHODS:

We prospectively collected data from attempts at ultrasound-guided venous catheter insertion between the antecubital fossa and mid-humerus. Each ultrasound machine's ruler function was used to determine depth from the skin to the closest vein edge and that vein's largest diameter. Success was defined as being able to freely withdraw blood or inject saline after the first skin puncture, considering each encounter independently. We calculated relative success rates, confidence intervals, and p values using reference groups selected by histogram analysis.

RESULTS:

Thirty-five operators recorded 180 encounters; 100 (56%) were successful on the first skin puncture, and 152 (84%) were eventually successful. Success rates were not linearly related to vein width or depth. Success rates were higher for veins with diameter > or = 0.4 cm vs. those < 0.4 cm (63% [78/124] vs. 39% [22/56], relative success 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.3], p = 0.005) and for veins of depth 0.3-1.5 cm vs. veins of depth < 0.3 or > 1.5 cm (58% [96/165] vs. 27% [4/15], relative success 2.2 [95% CI 0.9-5.1], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION:

Success rates are higher in larger veins (> or = 0.4 cm) and veins at moderate depth (0.3-1.5 cm).

PMID:
19272730
DOI:
10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.01.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center