Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):626-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.027.

The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure.

Author information

1
Current affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Israel. sben-horin@013.net.il

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There are scant data regarding the outcome of consecutive repeated procedures in patients who failed to adequately clean their colon for colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the outcome of a second colonoscopy after preparation-associated failure of the first colonoscopy.

DESIGN AND SETTING:

A retrospective study in a tertiary-referral center.

PATIENTS:

All patients with failure of colonoscopy because of poor preparation within a 1-year period.

RESULTS:

Of a total of 6990 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 307 procedures (4.4%) failed because of inadequate preparation. Data on subsequent repeated colonoscopies were available for 235 patients. The repeated procedure again failed because of unsatisfactory preparation in 54 of these patients (23%). The failure rate in subsequent third and fourth colonoscopies was also high (more than 25%). Of the various patient and procedure-related parameters examined, only the use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) was found to be predictive of a failed repeated preparation (odds ratio [OR] 3.2 [95% CI, 1.6-6.3], P < .001). In contrast, a next-day colonoscopy after failure of the index procedure was associated with a reduced risk of unsatisfactory second preparation (OR 0.31 [95% CI, 0.1-0.92], P = .03).

LIMITATIONS:

Validated data on the specific bowel purgatives used were not available.

CONCLUSIONS:

Almost a fourth of patients with an unacceptable colonic preparation will also fail the repeated colonoscopy, and patients who use CCB are at particular risk for failure. Strategies to manage this difficult-to-treat patient group should be investigated and may possibly include a preference for next-day colonoscopy.

PMID:
19251002
DOI:
10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.027
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center