Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jul;65(7):582-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.082602. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions.

Author information

1
Public and Environmental Health Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK. chris.bonell@lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There has been a recent increase in interest in alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions. We aim to describe specific scenarios in which randomised trials may not be possible and describe, exemplify and assess alternative strategies.

METHODS:

Non-systematic exploratory review.

RESULTS:

In many scenarios barriers are surmountable so that randomised trials (including stepped-wedge and crossover trials) are possible. It is possible to rank alternative designs but context will also determine which choices are preferable. Evidence from non-randomised designs is more convincing when confounders are well-understood, measured and controlled; there is evidence for causal pathways linking intervention and outcomes and/or against other pathways explaining outcomes; and effect sizes are large.

CONCLUSION:

Non-randomised trials might provide adequate evidence to inform decisions when interventions are demonstrably feasible and acceptable, and where evidence suggests there is little potential for harm, but caution that such designs may not provide adequate evidence when intervention feasibility or acceptability is doubtful, and where existing evidence suggests benefits may be marginal and/or harms possible.

PMID:
19213758
DOI:
10.1136/jech.2008.082602
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center