Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Mar;12(3):349-55. doi: 10.1038/nn.2260. Epub 2009 Feb 8.

An electrophysiological signature of unconscious recognition memory.

Author information

1
Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program and Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA. joelvoss@illinois.edu

Abstract

Contradicting the common assumption that accurate recognition reflects explicit-memory processing, we provide evidence for recognition lacking two hallmark explicit-memory features: awareness of memory retrieval and facilitation by attentive encoding. Kaleidoscope images were encoded in conjunction with an attentional diversion and were subsequently recognized more accurately than those encoded without diversion. Confidence in recognition was superior following attentive encoding, although recognition was markedly accurate when people claimed to be unaware of memory retrieval. This 'implicit recognition' was associated with frontal-occipital negative brain potentials at 200-400 ms post-stimulus-onset, which were spatially and temporally distinct from positive brain potentials corresponding to explicit recollection and familiarity. This dissociation between behavioral and electrophysiological characteristics of 'implicit recognition' versus explicit recognition indicates that a neurocognitive mechanism with properties similar to those that produce implicit memory can be operative in standard recognition tests. People can accurately discriminate repeat stimuli from new stimuli without necessarily knowing it.

PMID:
19198606
PMCID:
PMC2692915
DOI:
10.1038/nn.2260
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center