Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Chest. 2009 Jun;135(6):1580-1587. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2040. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

Imprecision in automated volume measurements of pulmonary nodules and its effect on the level of uncertainty in volume doubling time estimation.

Author information

1
Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Electronic address: nieterpj@musc.edu.
2
Department of Radiology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
3
General Electric Global Research, Niskayuna, NY.
4
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
5
Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Detection of small indeterminate pulmonary nodules (4 to 10 mm in diameter) in clinical practice is increasing, largely because of increased utilization and improved imaging technology. Although there currently exists software for CT scan machines that automate nodule volume estimation, the imprecision associated with volume estimates is particularly poor for nodules < or = 6 mm in diameter, with greater imprecision associated with increasing CT scan slice thickness. This study examined the effects of the volume estimation error associated with four CT scan slice thicknesses (0.625, 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 mm) on estimates of volume doubling time (VDT) for solid nodules of various sizes.

METHODS:

Data reflecting the accuracy of 1,624 automated volume estimations were obtained from experiments incorporating volume estimation software, performed on a commercially available lung phantom. These data informed mathematical simulations that were used to estimate imprecision around VDT estimates for hypothetical pairs of volume estimates for a given solid pulmonary nodule observed at different time points.

RESULTS:

The confidence intervals around the VDT estimates were extremely wide for 2.50- and 5.00-mm slice thicknesses, often encompassing values traditionally associated with both benignity and malignity for simulated 1- and 2-mm growths in diameter.

CONCLUSIONS:

Because of the inaccuracy in automated volume estimation, the confidence a clinician should have in estimating VDT should be highly dependent on the degree of observed growth and on the CT scan slice thickness. The performance of CT scanners with slice thicknesses of > or = 2.5 mm for assessing growth in pulmonary nodules is essentially inadequate for 1-mm changes in nodule diameter.

PMID:
19141526
PMCID:
PMC5989730
DOI:
10.1378/chest.08-2040
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center