Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2426-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0672-y. Epub 2009 Jan 7.

Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Author information

1
Orthopaedic Centre, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. wender@me.com

Abstract

Hemiarthroplasty is the most commonly used treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. There is limited evidence in the literature of improved functional outcome with cemented implants, although serious cement-related complications have been reported. We performed a randomized, controlled trial in patients 70 years and older comparing a cemented implant (112 hips) with an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated implant (108 hips), both with a bipolar head. The mean Harris hip score showed equivalence between the groups, with 70.9 in the cemented group and 72.1 in the uncemented group after 3 months (mean difference, 1.2) and 78.9 and 79.8 after 12 months (mean difference, 0.9). In the uncemented group, the mean duration of surgery was 12.4 minutes shorter and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 89 mL less. The Barthel Index and EQ-5D scores did not show any differences between the groups. The rates of complications and mortality were similar between groups. Both arthroplasties may be used with good results after displaced femoral neck fractures.

PMID:
19130162
PMCID:
PMC2866935
DOI:
10.1007/s11999-008-0672-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center