Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.010. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

A simulation study to evaluate the impact of the number of lesions measured on response assessment.

Author information

1
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 307 East 63rd Street, New York, NY 10065, USA. moskowc1@MSKCC.ORG

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether the number of lesions that are used to measure tumour burden affects response assessment and inter-rater variability. In order to accomplish this, a simulation study was conducted. Data were generated from a mixed-effects mixture model. Parameter values to input in the model were obtained from the analysis of real data. Response assessments based on 10, five, three, two and one lesion were evaluated. There was little difference between response assessments based on five lesions and response assessments based on 10 lesions. When fewer than five lesions were used to assess response, there were notable differences from the 10 lesion-based response assessment. Basing response assessment on a small number of lesions tends to overestimate response rates and leads to misclassification of patients' response status. Therefore, measuring five lesions per patient appears to sufficiently capture patients' response to therapy. Measuring fewer than five lesions results in the loss of information that may adversely affect clinical trial results as well as patient management.

PMID:
19095439
PMCID:
PMC2652848
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.010
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center