Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Jun;10(4):513-8. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen317. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

Contrast echocardiography for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations screening: does any bubble matter?

Author information

1
Cardiology Department, Maggiore Hospital, Crema, Italy.

Abstract

AIMS:

To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of contrast echocardiography (CE) as compared with CT, for the screening of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT); to evaluate the clinical significance of semi-quantitative analysis of a shunt on CE.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

A blinded prospective study was conducted in 190 consecutive subjects at risk of HHT who underwent screening for PAVMs, including clinical evaluation, pulse oximetry, standard and CE, and chest multirow CT without contrast medium. A semi-quantitative analysis of the shunt size was performed according to the contrast echo opacification of the left-sided chambers: Grade 0, no bubbles; 1, occasional filling with <20 bubbles; 2, moderate filling; 3, complete opacification. The first 100 patients were compared with 100 controls. A total of 119 (63%) patients had positive CE (32.2% Grade 1, 13.1% Grade 2, 11% Grade 3, 6.3% with patent foramen ovale). The overall diagnostic performance of CE was sensitivity 1.00, specificity 0.49, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.32, negative predictive value (NPV) 1.00. The PPV for the different grades was 0.00 for Grade 1, 0.56 for Grade 2, 1.00 for Grade 3; the NPV of Grade 0 was 1.00. A significant correlation was found between the CE grading and the number of PAVM, and complications (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION:

CE is an extremely sensitive procedure for the detection of PAVMs with substantial clinical impact.

PMID:
19091794
DOI:
10.1093/ejechocard/jen317
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center