Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Jul;123(7):737-41. doi: 10.1017/S0022215108004192. Epub 2008 Dec 2.

Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur.

Author information

1
Department of ENT, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt SK & KS Children's Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the procedure, results and complications of conventional septoplasty with those of endoscopic septoplasty, in cases of limited septal deviation and septal spurs.

DESIGN:

Prospective study; interventional type; randomised block design; comparative clinical trial.

METHODS:

We included in the study 80 patients presenting with limited septal deviation, septal spur with nasal obstruction, or deviated septum with septal correction was required in order to access the ostio-meatal complex (OMC) for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Of these 12 were children with septal deviation producing significant nasal obstruction. All patients were divided into two groups- with one undergoing conventional and the other endoscopic septoplasty. Post-operative assessment was carried out one month, three months and one to two years after the procedure.

RESULT:

Post-operative complications such as haemorrhage, infraorbital oedema, nasal pain and in-patient hospital was slightly more in the conventional septoplasty group.

CONCLUSION:

No statistically significant difference was found between the conventional and endoscopic septoplasty groups, as assessed by subjective and objective evaluation.

PMID:
19046471
DOI:
10.1017/S0022215108004192
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Cambridge University Press
    Loading ...
    Support Center