Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Neurooncol. 2009 Apr;92(2):149-55. doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9745-8. Epub 2008 Nov 29.

An exploratory survival analysis of anti-angiogenic therapy for recurrent malignant glioma.

Author information

1
Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA. anorden@partners.org

Abstract

Recent clinical trial results suggest that anti-angiogenic therapy may be effective against recurrent malignant glioma. Though these treatments prolong progression-free survival, the extent to which they prolong overall survival is unknown. We pooled data from 34 patients treated at a single institution on phase II clinical trials of bevacizumab and cediranib, and we compared these data to 18 patients treated on clinical trials of cytotoxic chemotherapies. In univariate and multivariate analyses, treatment group was a significant predictor of progression-free but not overall survival. Median progression-free survival was 8 vs. 22 weeks in patients treated with cytotoxic as compared to anti-angiogenic therapy (P = 0.01). Median overall survival was nearly identical in the two groups (39 vs. 37 weeks). The results of this exploratory analysis suggest that anti-angiogenic therapy may fail to prolong overall survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. If this conclusion proves correct, progression-free survival may be an inappropriate endpoint for phase II trials of anti-angiogenic therapies.

PMID:
19043778
DOI:
10.1007/s11060-008-9745-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center