Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 Dec;43(12):1233-41. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20950.

The EPICure study: comparison of pediatric spirometry in community and laboratory settings.

Author information

Portex Anaesthesia, Intensive Therapy, Respiratory Medicine and Respiratory Physiology Unit, UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.



Accuracy of spirometry testing is a prerequisite for its use as an objective outcome measure in large epidemiological studies. We compared spirometry measurements obtained by trained pediatricians in a variety of school settings with those obtained in the laboratory by respiratory physiologists.


Following a 3-day training course, three pediatricians carried out spirometry in children born extremely preterm (EP) and age matched controls in schools across the UK and Ireland (The EPICure study). A subgroup had repeated measurements in the laboratory. Spirometric flows and volumes were expressed as Z-scores. Bland-Altman analysis was used to calculate within-subject differences.


Fifty children (40% boys), 37 (74%) of whom were born EP, with a mean age 10.8 years had paired spirometry results (average interval between tests: 20.3 weeks). There was no statistically significant difference between any of the outcome variables: mean (95% CI of difference) in Z-scores [school-laboratory]) being 0.0 (-0.1; 0.1) for FEV(1), 0.1 (-0.1; 0.3) for FVC, -0.1 (-0.3; 0.1) for FEF(25-75), and 0.0 (-0.3; 0.1) for FEV(1)/FVC. Within individuals, the 95% limits of agreement for repeated measures were within +/- 1 Z-score for FEV(1) and FVC, and within +/- 1.5 Z-score for FEF(25-75) and FEV(1)/FVC.


With appropriate training, quality control, and support, pediatric spirometry can reliably be performed outside the lung function laboratory.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center