Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Aug;44(10):741-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052167. Epub 2008 Nov 3.

Validation of the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometry.

Author information

1
Environment Society and Design Division, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Validation of instruments used to measure physical activity patterns is essential when attempting to assess the effectiveness of physical activity interventions.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the validity of two self-report physical activity questionnaires on a representative sample of New Zealand adults.

METHODS:

70 adults aged 18-65 years from around Christchurch, New Zealand were required to wear an ActiGraph GT1M accelerometer during all waking hours for 7 consecutive days. Immediately following the 7 day accelerometer period participants were required to complete the long forms of both the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF).

RESULTS:

Both the NZPAQ-LF and the IPAQ-LF questionnaires showed small to moderate correlations with ActiGraph data for time spent in moderate-intensity physical activity (r=0.19-0.30) and total physical activity (sum of moderate and vigorous-intensity physical activity, r=0.30-0.32). In comparison with the ActiGraph data, both self-report questionnaires tended to overestimate activity levels by approximately 165%. Total physical activity levels gathered from both questionnaires were strongly correlated with each other (r=0.79) and showed good levels of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots.

CONCLUSIONS:

The long forms of the NZPAQ and IPAQ were found to have acceptable validity when detecting participants' ability to meet activity guidelines based on exercise duration, but a significant amount of overestimation was evident. This presents a need for both instruments to be further developed and tested in order to increase validity.

PMID:
18981036
DOI:
10.1136/bjsm.2008.052167
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center