Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD001451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3.

Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).

Author information

1
Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK, L8 7SS. leanne.bricker@lwh.nhs.uk

Update in

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Diagnostic ultrasound is used selectively in late pregnancy where there are specific clinical indications. However, the value of routine late pregnancy ultrasound screening in unselected populations is controversial. The rationale for such screening would be the detection of clinical conditions which place the fetus or mother at high risk, which would not necessarily have been detected by other means such as clinical examination, and for which subsequent management would improve perinatal outcome.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effects on obstetric practice and pregnancy outcome of routine late pregnancy ultrasound, defined as greater than 24 weeks' gestation, in women with either unselected or low-risk pregnancies.

SEARCH STRATEGY:

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (February 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA:

All acceptably controlled trials of routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (defined as after 24 weeks).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

All three review authors were involved in assessing trial quality and data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS:

Eight trials recruiting 27,024 women were included. The quality of trials overall was satisfactory. There was no difference in antenatal, obstetric and neonatal intervention or morbidity in screened versus control groups. There was a slightly higher caesarean section rate in the screened group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Routine late pregnancy ultrasound was not associated with improvements in overall perinatal mortality. Placental grading as an adjunct to third trimester examination scan was associated with a significant reduction in the stillbirth rate in the one trial that assessed it. There is little information on long-term substantive outcomes such as neurodevelopment. There is a lack of data on maternal psychological effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:

Based on existing evidence, routine late pregnancy ultrasound in low-risk or unselected populations does not confer benefit on mother or baby. It may be associated with a small increase in caesarean section rates. There is a lack of data about the potential psychological effects of routine ultrasound in late pregnancy, and limited data about its effects on both short- and long-term neonatal and childhood outcome. Placental grading in the third trimester may be valuable, but whether reported results are reproducible remains to be seen, and future research of late pregnancy ultrasound should include evaluation of placental textural assessment.

Update of

PMID:
18843617
PMCID:
PMC4160656
DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center