Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Nov;5(11):688-9. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1345. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

In the era of multislice CT, do we still need leg ultrasonography to diagnose pulmonary embolism?

Author information

  • 1Research Education at St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital in Pontiac, MI 48341-5023, USA. steinp@trinity-health.org

Abstract

The results of a multicenter, randomized, prospective, noninferiority trial by Righini et al., together with the low prevalence of a positive CT venography (CTV) scan alone shown by many other investigators, indicate that leg studies after multislice CT angiography for thromboembolism are redundant. The proportion of diagnoses that are made on the basis of a positive CTV scan in patients with a negative multislice CT angiography scan, however, is 14% on average. The diagnostic yield of CTV and of compression ultrasound could be increased by their select use in patients who are likely to have deep-vein thrombosis. Radiation exposure from CTV can be reduced by eliminating imaging of the pelvic veins and by obtaining discontinuous axial images of the proximal leg veins. There are several valid reasons for recommending or not recommending leg studies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, and the choice of diagnostic tests should be individualized on a patient-by-patient basis.

PMID:
18797430
DOI:
10.1038/ncpcardio1345
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Support Center