Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0485-z. Epub 2008 Sep 10.

Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.

Author information

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44118, USA. uaasis@yahoo.com

Abstract

Prosthetic cost contributes greatly to the overall expense of THA. A key question, therefore, in the selection of implant technique is whether any price difference exists between a cementless and a cemented femoral prosthesis. We evaluated the price difference between the most commonly used cemented and cementless femoral stems at three high-volume academic medical centers. Each hospital's costs for prostheses from the manufacturers were recorded. The average cost of implanting a cementless femoral prosthesis was $296 more than the average cost of implanting a cemented femoral stem, even with the additional expense of two batches of bone cement and the accessories commonly used to achieve a third-generation cementing technique. The price difference was less variable if the cost of the prostheses from only the primary implant supplier for each institution was considered. As the number of THAs performed per year continues to escalate, implantation of a cemented femoral component remains an attractive method of fixation from an economic standpoint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level III, economic and decision analysis. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:
18781368
PMCID:
PMC2674154
DOI:
10.1007/s11999-008-0485-z
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center