Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Pediatr Health Care. 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2007.07.006. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

Induction therapy for pediatric focal proliferative lupus nephritis: cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil.

Author information

1
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, 95817, USA. keith.lau@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:

Although cyclophosphamide has been used with success in children, mycophenolate may be a better alternative with less toxicity. The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of mycophenolate compared with cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in children with class III lupus nephritis.

METHODS:

We retrospectively studied pediatric patients with class III lupus nephritis from two pediatric centers from January 1991 to December 2005 who were treated either with monthly cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil for the first 6 months. Thirteen patients were studied, with seven patients in the cyclophosphamide group and six patients in the mycophenolate group.

RESULTS:

At 6 months, in the cyclophosphamide group, no patient had achieved complete remission, while 57% were in partial remission. In the mycophenolate group, 66% had achieved complete remission, 17% were in partial remission, and 17% were not in remission.

DISCUSSION:

In a small group of children with class III lupus nephritis, we observed a trend of more patients in the mycophenolate group achieving remission at 6 months. However, the long-term benefit of using mycophenolate as an induction agent is still unclear.

PMID:
18761229
DOI:
10.1016/j.pedhc.2007.07.006
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center