Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(9):581-4. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9280-0. Epub 2008 Aug 14.

Problems in using incidence to analyze risk factors in follow-up studies.

Author information

1
Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Public Health Institute, P.O. Box 95, 70701 Kuopio, Finland. Juha.Pekkanen@ktl.fi

Abstract

The most common practice to analyze epidemiological follow-up studies is to analyze risk factors of new, i.e. incident, cases of disease. However, analysis of incidence assumes that diseases exist in true dichotomies, which is unlikely to be true. It has also recently been shown that in many typical situations it is very difficult to separate the association between risk factors of disease at baseline and during follow-up using analyses of incidence. Situation is especially problematic for diseases that have large misclassification and low incidence, like asthma. We suggest that reliance on analysis of incidence may be a major obstacle into discovering causes of such disease. Only with greater attention into how to define and how to analyze prospective studies are we likely to learn sufficiently of risk factors of such disease to finally arrive at means for their prevention.

PMID:
18704701
DOI:
10.1007/s10654-008-9280-0
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center