Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Prev Med. 2008 Nov;47(5):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

Effectiveness of tobacco control among Chinese Americans: a comparative analysis of policy approaches versus community-based programs.

Author information

1
New York University College of Densitry, 423 East 23rd Street, New York, NY 10010, USA. ds186@nyu.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate the effectiveness of a tailored multicomponent community-based smoking cessation intervention among Chinese immigrants living in New York City, implemented within the context of state and city-wide tobacco control policy initiatives for the general population.

METHODS:

A pre-post-test quasi-experimental design with representative samples from Chinese populations living in two communities in New York City: Flushing, Queens, the intervention community and Sunset Park, Brooklyn, the comparison community. From November 2002 to August 2003 baseline interviews were conducted with 2537 adults aged 18-74. In early 2006, 1384 participants from the original cohort completed the follow-up interview. During the intervention period (October 2003 to September 2005), both communities were exposed to tobacco control public policy changes. However, only Flushing received additional linguistically and culturally-specific community-level tobacco control interventions.

RESULTS:

From 2002 to 2006 overall smoking prevalence among Chinese immigrants declined from 17.7% to 13.6%, a relative 23% decrease. After controlling for socio-demographic characteristics, there was an absolute 3.3% decrease in smoking prevalence attributed to policy changes with an additional absolute decline in prevalence of 2.8% in the intervention community relative to the control community.

CONCLUSION:

City-wide tobacco control policies are effective among high-risk urban communities, such as Chinese immigrants. In addition, community-based tailored tobacco control interventions may increase the reduction in smoking prevalence rates beyond that achieved from public policies.

PMID:
18687355
PMCID:
PMC2643380
DOI:
10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center