Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep;110(3):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

Validation of intraoperative risk assessment on frozen section for surgical management of endometrial carcinoma.

Author information

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. daniel.egle@i-med.ac.at

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of risk assessment in intraoperative frozen section (IFS) in order to direct surgical management and also attempted to validate the clinical significance of using five variables for classification as low- or intermediate high-risk endometrial carcinoma in routine practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Charts of 410 patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer between January 1992 and December 2003 were retrospectively reviewed, and risk assignment on the basis of IFS was compared with final pathological reports. Clinical relevance of risk assessment and its surgical consequences were studied on the basis of patient survival data.

RESULTS:

In 303 (95%) of 318 cases, IFS-assessed risk corresponded with that estimated from final paraffin sections, giving a positive predictive value of 99% and a negative predictive value of 92%. Unrecognized lymphovascular invasion in IFS was the main factor responsible for the discrepancies between the two examinations. Survival analysis showed a highly significantly better outcome for patients with low-risk as compared to intermediate high-risk carcinomas for recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). However, survival in patients with intermediate high-risk carcinomas who underwent lymphadenectomy (LNE) was not significantly improved as compared to those who did not. Moreover, in multivariate analysis lymph node involvement did not emerge as a variable with significant impact on survival. Age, tumor stage and intraoperatively assessed risk were seen to be independent prognosticators in this study (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION:

Our data show that IFS, when performed by experienced gynecopathologists, is a reliable and applicable tool in estimating risk in endometrial cancer and that systematic LNE seems to not be superior to radiotherapy with regard to patient survival.

PMID:
18653219
DOI:
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.007
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center