Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Health Econ Policy Law. 2008 Jan;3(Pt 1):69-77. doi: 10.1017/S1744133107004355.

Developing methods that really do value the 'Q' in the QALY.

Author information

  • 1Tanaka Business School, Imperial College, London, UK. paul.dolan@imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Most health economists recommend that improvements in health be valued by asking members of the general public to imagine themselves in different states of health and then to think about how many years of life they would give up or what risk of death they would be willing to accept in order to be in full health. In this paper, I argue that preferences are not a very good guide to future experiences and a more suitable way to value health is to ask people in different states of health how they think and feel about their lives. Valuing health in this way may result in greater priority being given to mental health services. Whatever the precise implications, it is my contention that it is much better to ration health care according to real experiences rather than according to hypothetical preferences.

Comment in

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Cambridge University Press
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk