Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Sep;117(1):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0102-6. Epub 2008 Jul 4.

Tumor size is an unreliable predictor of prognosis in basal-like breast cancers and does not correlate closely with lymph node status.

Author information

1
Departments of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. william.foulkes@mcgill.ca

Abstract

Larger breast tumors tend to be associated with a greater number of axillary lymph nodes involved with metastatic tumor than are smaller tumors. This rule may not fully apply in BRCA1-related breast cancers. We hypothesized that the rule also might not apply in basal-like breast cancers (BLBC), and further, that disruption of this relationship would impact on prognosis. In 1,324 non-BLBC (87.1% of 1520 tumors), after adjustment for grade, a strongly positive correlation between increasing tumor size and increasing number of lymph nodes involved by tumor was observed (P for trend <.001). The correlation was much weaker in 196 BLBC (12.9%) (P for trend = 0.58). Similarly, a worsening breast cancer-specific survival with increasing tumor size was observed in non-BLBC (P for trend <.001) but not in BLBC (P for trend = 0.43). The "size-nodes" relationship in BLBC is distinct and is similar to that seen in BRCA1-related breast cancer, further suggesting biological similarities between these sub-types of breast cancer. Moreover, tumor size is not a strong indicator of prognosis in BLBC.

PMID:
18600446
DOI:
10.1007/s10549-008-0102-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center