Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Jul;9(7):693-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70176-1.

Is our natural-history model of lung cancer wrong?

Author information

  • 1Health Outcomes Group, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. bachp@mskcc.org

Abstract

For screening to be successful in lung cancer, programmes need to identify a precursor of fatal disease that is highly treatable. This precursor is currently presumed to be early-stage lung cancer, and thus our current efforts in lung-cancer screening have focused on finding, and treating, early-stage lung cancer. In other words, our current natural-history model of lung cancer is based on the notion that for a period before a lung cancer becomes advanced and fatal, it is localised and treatable. Empirical findings emerging from studies of lung-cancer screening suggest this notion to be incorrect. These studies all suggest that early-stage histologically confirmed lung cancers identified by screening are not precursors of advanced or incurable disease. If true, these findings have potentially important implications for the development and assessment of new lung-cancer screening approaches.

Comment in

PMID:
18598934
DOI:
10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70176-1
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center