The validity and reliability of four measures of gambling behaviour in a sample of Singapore University students

J Gambl Stud. 2008 Dec;24(4):451-62. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9103-y. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of measures for detecting problem gamblers for use with university students in a Singapore context. The four instruments commonly used in gambling research, the DSM-IV, GA-20, SOGS and CPGI were administered to a sample of students (n = 193) from a representative cross section of faculties from one university. The CPGI was found to be the most reliable (alpha = 0.922) and valid in terms of construct validity as demonstrated by factor analysis. Despite being a lengthy instrument it is recommended that future studies such as randomized controlled trials of problem gambling interventions in Singapore adopt a modified version of the CPGI, made simpler and easier to use with fewer items and more appropriate terminology.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Behavior, Addictive / diagnosis*
  • Behavior, Addictive / epidemiology
  • Behavior, Addictive / psychology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Gambling / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Internal-External Control
  • Male
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk-Taking
  • Singapore / epidemiology
  • Students / psychology
  • Students / statistics & numerical data*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*