Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):476.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.055. Epub 2008 May 12.

New vs old: descriptors can affect patients' surgical preferences.

Author information

  • 1Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of the study was to determine whether the designation of a procedure as newer leads more patients to choose that procedure over 1 that is designated as older.

STUDY DESIGN:

Women with stress incontinence read two 1-page descriptions of surgical procedures for treatment of stress incontinence and were asked to indicate which of the 2 surgical procedures they would choose whether they were going to choose surgical treatment. Randomly for half the participants, a rectus fascia sling was described as being a newer procedure and a mesh sling as an older procedure. For the other half of participants, a mesh sling was described as older and a fascia sling as newer. All participants were also asked whether, in general, they considered that newer surgical procedures were better than older surgical procedures and why.

RESULTS:

Forty-eight women of mean age 57 years (range, 33-82) were interviewed. Thirty-two patients (68%) chose the newer procedure, and 35 (74%) chose the fascia procedure, both percentages higher than would be expected by chance. When fascia was presented as being the newer procedure, it was chosen over the older mesh by 22 of 24 patients (92%), whereas when fascia was presented as being the older procedure, it was chosen over the newer mesh by a smaller margin. The great majority of patients (79%) stated that newer procedures are better in general.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that the use of the words newer or older may overshadow other important information that physicians intend to convey during surgical counseling.

PMID:
18468572
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.055
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center