Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BJU Int. 2008 Aug 5;102(5):586-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07612.x. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

Is there an alternative to pad tests? Correlation of subjective variables of severity of urinary loss to the 1-h pad test in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Author information

1
Department of Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery and Urogynaecology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK. avmfranco@yahoo.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the 1-h pad test in women who have urodynamically confirmed stress incontinence (USI) with a patient-based 3-point symptom severity scale and validated quality of life (QoL) questionnaires.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

In all, 98 women with USI were prospectively recruited; all had a 1-h pad test and completed the validated disease-specific QoL questionnaires, including short forms of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). In addition, the severity of incontinence was determined using the Stamey grading scale, a visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and a patient-based 3-point symptom severity scale.

RESULTS:

The VAS, symptom severity scale, Stamey grade, UDI-6, and IIQ-7 failed to correlate significantly with the 1-h pad test. Only the ICIQ-SF correlated significantly with this test.

CONCLUSION:

The ICIQ-SF is easy to administer and, in this study, correlated best with the 1-h pad test in women with pure primary or secondary USI. It incorporates both symptom severity and QoL variables. We recommend its routine use in clinical practice.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center