Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Neurosci. 2008 Mar 25;9:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-33.

Internal and external information in error processing.

Author information

1
Department of Neurology II, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. marcus.heldmann@med.ovgu.de

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The use of self-generated and externally provided information in performance monitoring is reflected by the appearance of error-related and feedback-related negativities (ERN and FRN), respectively. Several authors proposed that ERN and FRN are supported by similar neural mechanisms residing in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the mesolimbic dopaminergic system. The present study is aimed to test the functional relationship between ERN and FRN. Using an Eriksen-Flanker task with a moving response deadline we tested 17 young healthy subjects. Subjects received feedback with respect to their response accuracy and response speed. To fulfill both requirements of the task, they had to press the correct button and had to respond in time to give a valid response.

RESULTS:

When performance monitoring based on self-generated information was sufficient to detect a criterion violation an ERN was released, while the subsequent feedback became redundant and therefore failed to trigger an FRN. In contrast, an FRN was released if the feedback contained information which was not available before and action monitoring processes based on self-generated information failed to detect an error.

CONCLUSION:

The described pattern of results indicates a functional interrelationship of response and feedback related negativities in performance monitoring.

PMID:
18366727
PMCID:
PMC2291472
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2202-9-33
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center