Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):226-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f9d6a.

The impact of different warm-up protocols on vertical jump performance in male collegiate athletes.

Author information

1
Strength and Conditioning Athletic Department, University of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana, USA. bh110@evansville.edu

Erratum in

  • J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1720.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of different types of warm-up on countermovement vertical jump (VJ) performance. Sixty-four male Division I collegiate football players completed a pretest for VJ height. The participants were then randomly assigned to a warm-up only condition, a warm-up plus static stretching condition, a warm-up plus dynamic stretching condition, or a warm-up plus dynamic flexibility condition. VJ performance was tested immediately after the completion of the warm-up. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P < .05) in VJ performance between the warm-up groups. Posttest jump performance improved in all groups; however, the mean for the static stretching group was significantly lower than the means for the other 3 groups. The static stretching negated the benefits gained from a general warm-up when performed immediately before a VJ test.

PMID:
18296979
DOI:
10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f9d6a
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center