Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90 Suppl 1:62-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01556.

Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing.

Author information

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Room 3A-36, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

Abstract

Although there are numerous methods for defining fracture-healing in clinical studies, no consensus exists regarding the most valid and reliable manner for assessing union or for determining which outcomes are most important. This article summarizes and describes methods for the clinical assessment of fracture-healing and reports results from a systematic review of prevalent definitions currently used in published clinical studies. Conventional radiography and ad hoc clinical definitions continue to be the most commonly used means of assessing fracture-healing in clinical studies. Investigators must improve upon and apply more rigorous outcome assessment in clinical trials, emphasize patient-important outcomes, and report factors that may bias estimated effects.

PMID:
18292359
DOI:
10.2106/JBJS.G.01556
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center