Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):641-3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0546-8. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

Desiderata or dogma: what the evidence reveals about physician attire.

Author information

1
Partners Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Neurology Clinic, Wang Ambulatory Center 8th Floor, Boston, MA, USA. mtbianchi@partners.org

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Physician-patient interactions are complex and depend on multiple factors including common cultural definitions and evolving social norms. The once purely philosophical debate over what constitutes appropriate physician attire can benefit from a growing evidence base in the literature.

DISCUSSION:

Although this literature is commonly regarded as supporting traditional attire, the data actually represent a more balanced distribution of opinions held by patients and by physicians. Perhaps interpretations favoring a conservative approach are expected given the history and tradition of the physician-patient relationship.

CONCLUSION:

Nevertheless, in the age of evidence-based medicine, it is difficult to argue against scrutiny of the available literature. Evidence that challenges the importance of traditional physician attire is reviewed.

PMID:
18286342
PMCID:
PMC2324152
DOI:
10.1007/s11606-008-0546-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center