Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Hematol. 2008 Jul;83(7):580-8. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21154.

Intravenous iron: from anathema to standard of care.

Author information

  • 1Division of Hematology and Oncology, Private Practice Baltimore Maryland, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. mauerbachmd@aol.com

Abstract

A growing body of literature supports the use of intravenous iron as a compliment to erythropoiesis stimulatory therapy and in a significant number of disease states where iron is necessary and oral iron is ineffective or not tolerated. The differences in efficacy, safety, and clinical nature of serious adverse events that occur with the various iron preparations are poorly understood. Misinterpretation of adverse events leads to underutilization of this important treatment modality. Understanding the history of the development and use of intravenous iron is crucial to appreciate its importance in the management of anemias of dialysis, cancer, and cancer chemotherapy and properly assess side effects and toxicity. The benefits seen with intravenous iron therapy are independent of the pretreatment levels of serum ferritin, iron, total iron binding capacity, and percent transferrin saturation. Intravenous iron has been shown to overcome hepcidin induced iron restricted erythropoiesis in iron-replete patients. Available clinical and experimental data suggest that increased utilization of intravenous iron should be considered.

(c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk