Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Langmuir. 2008 Mar 18;24(6):2655-62. doi: 10.1021/la701880h. Epub 2008 Feb 6.

Comparative study on different carbon nanotube materials in terms of transparent conductive coatings.

Author information

1
Nanotechnology Center and Applied Science Department, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, USA. zxli@ualr.edu

Abstract

We compared conductive transparent carbon nanotube coatings on glass substrates made of differently produced single-wall (SWNT), double-wall, and multiwall carbon nanotubes. The airbrushing approach and the vacuum filtration method were utilized for the fabrication of carbon nanotube films. The optoelectronic performance of the carbon nanotube film was found to strongly depend on many effects including the ratio of metallic-to-semiconducting tubes, dispersion, length, diameter, chirality, wall number, structural defects, and the properties of substrates. The electronic transportability and optical properties of the SWNT network can be significantly altered by chemical doping with thionyl chloride. Hall effect measurements revealed that all of these thin carbon nanotube films are of p-type probably due to the acid reflux-based purification and atmospheric impurities. The competition between variable-range hoping and fluctuation-assisted tunneling in the functionized carbon nanotube system could lead to a crossover behavior in the temperature dependence of the network resistance.

PMID:
18251555
DOI:
10.1021/la701880h
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Chemical Society
    Loading ...
    Support Center