Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Maturitas. 2008 Feb 20;59(2):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Jan 24.

Impact of lean mass and fat mass on bone mineral density: The Hordaland Health Study.

Author information

1
Section for Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. clara.gjesdal@isf.uib.no

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To examine the relationship between soft tissue composition and bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip and whether these relationships differ by gender and age.

METHODS:

Femoral neck BMD and total body soft tissue composition were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a population-based sample of 5205 men and women 47-50 and 71-75 years old. Analysis of covariance was used to explore possible modifying effects of sex and gender on the impact of fat and lean mass on BMD.

RESULTS:

The difference in BMD per kilo lean mass (LM) was larger than the difference per kilo fat mass (FM). The effect of FM on BMD was significantly greater among women than among men. In multivariate adjusted analyses, 10kg increase in LM was associated with a 0.083 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.075, 0.092)g/cm(2) increase in BMD. A 10kg increase in FM was associated with 0.013 (0.007, 0.019)g/cm(2) increase in BMD among men and 0.021 (0.017, 0.026)g/cm(2) among women. There was indication of a steeper dose-response relationship at lower levels of FM among women.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to FM, LM was generally more strongly related to BMD of the femoral neck in middle-aged and elderly men and women. FM was a significantly stronger predictor of BMD among women than among men, particularly at lower levels of FM.

PMID:
18221845
DOI:
10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.11.002
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center