Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Feb;40(2):345-50. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a83dc.

Determinants of 800-m and 1500-m running performance using allometric models.

Author information

1
1English Institute of Sport, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK. E.steve.ingham@eis2win.co.uk

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To identify the optimal aerobic determinants of elite, middle-distance running (MDR) performance, using proportional allometric models.

METHODS:

Sixty-two national and international male and female 800-m and 1500-m runners undertook an incremental exercise test to volitional exhaustion. Mean submaximal running economy (ECON), speed at lactate threshold (speedLT), maximum oxygen uptake (.VO(2max)), and speed associated with .VO(2max) (speed.VO(2max)) were paired with best performance times recorded within 30 d. The data were analyzed using a proportional power-function ANCOVA model.

RESULTS:

The analysis identified significant differences in running speeds with main effects for sex and distance, with .VO(2max) and ECON as the covariate predictors (P < 0.0001). The results suggest a proportional curvilinear association between running speed and the ratio (.VO(2max).ECON(-0.71))(0.35) explaining 95.9% of the variance in performance. The model was cross-validated with a further group of highly trained MDR, demonstrating strong agreement (95% limits, 0.05 +/- 0.29 m.s(-1)) between predicted and actual performance speeds (R(2) = 93.6%). The model indicates that for a male 1500-m runner with a .VO(2max) of 3.81 L.min(-1) and ECON of 15 L.km(-1) to improve from 250 to 240 s, it would require a change in .VO(2max) from 3.81 to 4.28 L.min(-1), an increase of Delta0.47 L.min(-1). However, improving by the same margin of 10 s from 225 to 215 s would require a much greater increase in .VO(2max), from 5.14 to 5.85 L.min(-1), an increase of Delta0.71 L.min(-1) (where ECON remains constant).

CONCLUSION:

A proportional curvilinear ratio of .VO(2max) divided by ECON explains 95.9% of the variance in MDR performance.

PMID:
18202566
DOI:
10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a83dc
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Support Center