Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Dec;13(4):273-81. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273.

The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, Campus Box 1125, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA. butler@wustl.edu

Abstract

Two experiments investigated how the type and timing of feedback influence learning from a multiple-choice test. First, participants read 12 prose passages, which covered various general knowledge topics (e.g., The Sun) and ranged between 280 and 300 words in length. Next, they took an initial six-alternative, multiple-choice test on information contained in the passages. Feedback was given immediately for some of the multiple-choice items or after delay for other items. Participants were either shown the correct answer as feedback (standard feedback) or were allowed to keep answering until the correct answer was discovered (answer-until-correct feedback). Learning from the test was assessed on a delayed cued-recall test. The results indicated that delayed feedback led to superior final test performance relative to immediate feedback. However, type of feedback did not matter: discovering the correct answer through answer-until-correct feedback produced equivalent performance relative to standard feedback. This research suggests that delaying the presentation of feedback after a test is beneficial to learning because of the spaced presentation of information.

PMID:
18194050
DOI:
10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for American Psychological Association
Loading ...
Support Center