Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;15(2):415-23. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Abstract

Studies based on large population-based data sets, such as administrative claims data and tumor registry data, have become increasingly common in surgical oncology research. These data sets can be acquired relatively easily, and they offer larger sample sizes and improved generalizability compared with institutional data. There are, however, significant limitations that must be considered in the analysis and interpretation of such data. Invalid conclusions can result when insufficient attention is paid to issues such as data quality and depth, potential sources of bias, missing data, type I error, and the assessment of statistical significance. This article reviews some important limitations of population-based data sets and the methods used to analyze them. The candid reporting of these issues in the literature and an increased awareness among surgical oncologists of these limitations will ensure that population-based studies in the surgical oncology literature achieve high standards of methodological quality and clinical utility.

PMID:
17987343
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-007-9658-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center