Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Mar;53(3):680-8. Epub 2007 Oct 13.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies for diagnosing celiac disease.

Author information

1
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, CB#7080, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. sdorn@med.unc.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare strategies for diagnosing celiac disease (CD).

METHODS:

A decision analytic model was used to compare five strategies on diagnostic performance and costs.

RESULTS:

First, tTG screening alone is the least costly strategy ($22/individual). While the NPV is high (99.8%), the PPV is low (63.4%). Second, if tTG-positive patients undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to confirm CD, the PPV increases to 100% ($2,237/false-positive diagnosis avoided). Third, if EGDs are restricted to only those who are both tTG and HLA DQ2/8 positive, costs are slightly reduced ($59 vs. $63/individual), while PPV and NPV remain unchanged. Fourth, screening tTG-negative patients for IgA deficiency increases the NPV to 99.9% ($32,605/false-negative diagnosis avoided). Sensitivity analyses revealed that as the prevalence of CD increases, the cost of avoiding a false-positive diagnosis by adding EGD to the tTG alone strategy increases considerably.

CONCLUSIONS:

When the pre-test probability of CD is low, patients with positive tTG serology should undergo EGD with biopsy-either directly or after positive screening for HLA DQ2/8-to confirm CD. As the pre-test probability of CD increases, the added cost of EGD should be weighed against the consequences of a false-positive diagnosis. Routinely screening for IgA deficiency in order to avoid a false-negative diagnosis is quite costly.

PMID:
17934849
DOI:
10.1007/s10620-007-9939-5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center