Format

Send to

Choose Destination
World J Surg. 2007 Nov;31(11):2236-42. Epub 2007 Sep 1.

Conventional versus invaginated stripping of the great saphenous vein: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. m.scheltinga@mmc.nl

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

An invaginated strip of the great saphenous vein (GSV) may be associated with diminished blood loss and less discomfort compared to conventional stripping in patients with unilateral primary GSV varicosis.

METHODS:

Ninety-two patients were randomized for conventional (CON) or invaginated (INVAG) stripping and were followed for 26 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS:

Both groups (n = 46) were well balanced for age, gender distribution, and body mass index. The CON group lost twice as much blood compared to the INVAG group (CON: 28 +/- 4 g, INVAG: 15 +/- 2 g, p < 0.001). Infragenual incision length following a conventional strip was twice as long (CON: 16 +/- 1 mm, INVAG: 8 +/- 1 mm, p < 0.001). Pain as measured with a visual analog scale (minimal 0, max 10) decreased in both groups in a similar fashion from 3.2 +/- 0.3 preoperatively to 0.6 +/- 0.2 after 26 weeks (p < 0.001). Saphenous nerve damage after one month was observed in four CON patients compared to no patients following invagination. Return to work was not different (CON: 13 +/- 2 days, INVAG: 11 +/- 2 days).

CONCLUSION:

Invagination of the GSV in uncomplicated primary varicosis may be associated with less surgical trauma compared to a conventional stripping technique.

PMID:
17763897
PMCID:
PMC2039792
DOI:
10.1007/s00268-007-9211-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center