Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2(1):31-9.

Comparison of a short food frequency questionnaire with the Youth/Adolescent Questionnaire in the Growing Up Today Study.

Author information

1
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. helaine.rockett@channing.harvard.edu

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Our purpose was to design and evaluate a shorter version of our 126-item food frequency questionnaire (long FFQ) for use with adolescents. A shorter FFQ is needed that can reliably rank research subjects according to their intakes of energy, macronutrients and selected micronutrients.

METHODS:

Dietary data were collected annually, for 3 years, using the full-list FFQ from 16 882 participants of the Growing Up Today Study (GUTS). From this full-list FFQ data, the top ten food contributors for energy and each macronutrient, and the top five food contributors for eight other selected micronutrients were compiled to create a 26-item (short-list) FFQ. Arithmetic means and Pearson correlations were computed to assess relationships between nutrient intakes estimated from the short- and full-list FFQs. We further compared both FFQs with three 24-hour recalls (approximately every 4 months over a 1-year period). Linear regression models were fitted, using energy and nutrients estimated from the short-list FFQ and separately from the full-list FFQ, to see how results may differ.

RESULTS:

As expected, mean nutrient values from the short-list FFQ were substantially below those from the full-list FFQ. Pearson correlations >0.85 between the short- and full-list FFQs were found for most nutrients. However, correlations between nutrients from the short-list FFQ and the three 24-hour recalls were lower (mean correlation =0.40) than the full-list FFQ. Linear regression models suggested that the short-list FFQ performed nearly as well as the full-list FFQ, for studying associations between energy and several nutrients (trans fatty acids, saturated fat, and glycemic load) and the non-dietary factor, TV viewing. Model betas for energy and nutrients from the short-list FFQ were slightly smaller than betas obtained from the full-list FFQ, but all were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION:

The short-list FFQ can assess nutrient values of a population for analytic research purposes, such as studying associations between certain dietary intakes and non-dietary factors.

PMID:
17763008
DOI:
10.1080/17477160601095417
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center