Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Sep;63(3):310-6. Epub 2007 Aug 24.

Contrast-enhanced versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate cancer detection: an overview of techniques and a systematic review.

Author information

1
Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, NL 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. S.Heijmink@rad.umcn.nl

Abstract

An overview is given of the current conventional and contrast-specific transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) techniques for prostate imaging that may be used for guiding biopsy. Subsequently, a systematic literature search resulted in inclusion of four studies that directly compared systematic and contrast-enhanced-targeted TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate. All four studies revealed that contrast-enhanced-targeted TRUS-guided biopsy significantly improved the positive biopsy core rate. In the largest study, the mean Gleason score of the contrast-enhanced-targeted TRUS-guided biopsies was significantly higher than that of the systematic biopsies. Future randomized clinical trials, preferably in a non-academic multi-institutional set-up, will have to be performed to confirm the value of contrast-enhanced-targeted TRUS-guided biopsy in regular clinical practice.

PMID:
17719734
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.027
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center