Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Virol. 2007 Sep;40(1):38-42. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

Probabilities in norovirus outbreak diagnosis.

Author information

1
Center for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Erwin.Duizer@RIVM.NL

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Noroviruses are recognized as the most common cause of outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis. Yet, diagnostic testing for norovirus is based mostly on RNA detection by RT-PCR, which is not widely available. While antigen detection tests (ELISAs) are easier to perform, they are in general less sensitive.

OBJECTIVES:

Our aim was to provide a scientific basis for declaring norovirus as the causative agent of an outbreak of acute gastroenteritis.

STUDY DESIGN:

Statistical analysis used binomial distribution to determine the minimal number of positive samples, and the probability of detecting the required number of positive samples, for different tests, required to assign norovirus as the causative agent of an outbreak of acute gastroenteritis.

RESULTS:

For either a standard RT-PCR or a commercially available ELISA, finding only 1 sample positive out of 2, 3 or 4 samples is sufficient to assign norovirus as the causative agent of an outbreak of acute gastroenteritis. However, when ELISA is used, the probability of detecting this required minimum number of positive samples is low when small numbers of samples are tested (57% when 2 samples are tested; 72% when 3 samples are tested). In order to reach a 90% probability of detecting a norovirus outbreak (false negativity at outbreak level <10%), at least 3 samples should be tested using RT-PCR, and 6 samples when using an ELISA.

CONCLUSIONS:

The sensitivity for NoV outbreak diagnosis will increase from 57% to 92%, or from 84% to 96%, for ELISA or RT-PCR respectively, when sample size increases from 2 to 6. Thus, using ELISA instead of RT-PCR for the detection of norovirus in stool samples will result in considerable numbers of false negative outbreaks unless a minimum of 6 samples are tested per outbreak.

PMID:
17631044
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcv.2007.05.015
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center