Both conservative and surgical treatment of acetabular fractures alter biomechanical conditions in the hip joint resulting in various degenerative changes in the acetabulum and the femur head. These changes may progress to secondary coxarthrosis, causing dysfunction of the hip joint. The aim of this paper is to compare the outcomes of both conservative and surgical treatments in different types of acetabular fractures, so that clear indications for either conservative or surgical treatment could be determined. This paper is based on retrospective study of 103 patients with acetabular fracture (21 surgically treated and 82 conservatively treated). In this study the incidence of particular types of acetabulum fractures, the treatment period, the incidence of complications and the functional status of the hip after the treatment were analyzed. In patients with anterior fracture surgical treatment lasted three times less than conservative treatment and resulted in far better functional status of the hip joint compared to conservatively treated patients. However, in patients with transverse fractures the functional status was better and the treatment period shorter after the conservative treatment. We believe that the present treatment indications should be corrected so that in anterior column fracture the surgical method should be preferred, whereas the transverse fracture should be treated conservatively. In other types of acetabular fracture, with the radiographic roof arc angle of 45 degrees or less, the surgical method should be preferred to conservative method.