Background: Electrocardiographic ambulatory ECG monitoring plays a central role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with cardiac arrhythmias. We sought to evaluate the appropriateness of the prescription of ECG Holter recordings performed at our centre.
Methods: We interviewed 2489 consecutive patients (49% male, aged 61 +/- 32 years) undergoing ECG Holter. We recorded the indication for the examination, the clinical characteristics of the patient and the speciality of the prescribing physician. The appropriateness of the test was evaluated.
Results: We evaluated 2489 consecutive Holter recordings, of which 1298 (52%) were found to have been clearly appropriate (class I), 311 (13%) as probably or possibly appropriate (class II), and 880 (35%) as inappropriate (class III). The test was requested by a cardiologist in 776 cases (31%), of which 56.2% had a class I indication, 13.4% class II, and 30.4% class III. Tests requested by a non-cardiologist were clearly appropriate (class I) in 50% of cases, whereas 12% had a class II indication, and 38% were in class III. Supraventricular tachycardia was present in 33.4% of recordings with a class I indication, 9% of those in class II, and 57.6% of those in class III. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was present in 6% of those with class I indications, 2.6% of those in class II, and 7.4% of those in class III.
Conclusion: Our data showed that the majority of Holter recordings prescribed in our region are appropriate. Tests prescribed by cardiologists constitute only 31% of the total volume, but are more often appropriately prescribed.