Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 17;147(2):97-103. Epub 2007 Jun 4.

Changes in outcomes for internal medicine inpatients after work-hour regulations.

Author information

1
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8088, USA. leora.horwitz@yale.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Limits on resident work hours are intended to reduce fatigue-related errors, but may raise risk by increasing transfers of responsibility for patients.

OBJECTIVE:

To examine changes in outcomes for internal medicine patients after the implementation of work-hour regulations.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Urban, academic medical center.

PATIENTS:

14,260 consecutive patients discharged from the teaching (housestaff) service and 6664 consecutive patients discharged from the nonteaching (hospitalist) service between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2004.

MEASUREMENTS:

Outcomes included intensive care unit utilization, length of stay, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission rate to the study institution, pharmacist interventions to prevent error, drug-drug interactions and in-hospital death.

RESULTS:

The teaching service had net improvements in 3 outcomes. Relative to changes experienced by the nonteaching service, the rate of intensive care unit utilization decreased by 2.1% (95% CI, -3.3% to -0.7%; P = 0.002), the rate of discharge to home or rehabilitation facility versus elsewhere improved by 5.3% (CI, 2.6% to 7.6%; P < 0.001), and pharmacist interventions to prevent error were reduced by 1.92 interventions per 100 patient-days (CI, -2.74 to -1.03 interventions per 100 patient-days; P < 0.001). Teaching and nonteaching services had similar changes over time in length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and adverse drug-drug interactions. In-hospital death was uncommon in both groups, and change over time was similar in the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS:

The study was a retrospective, nonrandomized design that assessed a limited number of outcomes. Teaching and nonteaching cohorts may not have been affected similarly by secular trends in patient care.

CONCLUSIONS:

After the implementation of work-hour regulations, 3 of 7 outcomes improved for patients in the teaching service relative to those in the nonteaching service. The authors found no evidence of adverse unintended consequences after the institution of work-hour regulations.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center