Send to

Choose Destination
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Sep;22(9):2659-68. Epub 2007 Apr 30.

Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation.

Author information

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7M 0Z9, Canada.



Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from serum creatinine (Scr) or cystatin C (Cys C) exhibit variable performances.


We compared the performances of 14 Scr and 9 Cys C estimated GFR equations using inulin clearance (Clin) as the reference test in 103 stable renal transplant populations. Bias, precision, receiving operation characteristics (ROC), accuracy within 30% ranges from the reference method and agreements of each test were compared.


Mean Clin was 46.4+/-20.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. Scr and Cys C levels correlated well with each other (r=0.83, P<0.0001) and with Clin (r=-0.57 and -0.53, P<0.001, respectively). ROC analysis demonstrated no superiority of Cys C over Scr. Gats equation achieved the highest accuracy of 70% in patients with GFR>or=60 ml/min/1.73 m2. In patients with GFR>or=60 ml/min/1.73 m2, the Nankivell equation demonstrated the highest accuracy of 73.91%. Cys C-based equations were not depicted to be thoroughly accurate. Bias, precision and agreement were otherwise similar in all GFR tests.


Scr-based equations did not appear to be inferior to Cys C-based equations as a means to estimate GFR in renal transplant patients.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center