Growth hormone treatment of non-growth hormone-deficient growth disorders

Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2007 Mar;36(1):131-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2006.11.006.

Abstract

Although a large body of data on efficacy and safety of growth hormone (GH) treatment for various non-growth hormone-deficient (GHD) growth disorders has accumulated from a combination of clinical trial and postmarketing sources in the last 20 years or more, there remain limitations. Clinical trial data have the advantage of direct comparison of well-matched, randomized patient groups receiving treatment (or not) under comparable conditions and, as such, provide the highest quality evidence of efficacy. Clinical trials, however, are typically too small for any statistically valid assessment for safety, which is more comprehensively addressed using postmarketing data. Consequently, while the efficacy of GH treatment in children with non-GHD growth disorders has been solidly established and, based on the combination of the rigor of the clinical trial data and numerical power of the postmarketing data, no major concerns exist regarding safety, additional long-term data are required.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Body Height / drug effects
  • Growth Disorders / drug therapy*
  • Growth Disorders / etiology
  • Growth Disorders / genetics
  • Growth Hormone / adverse effects
  • Growth Hormone / therapeutic use*
  • Homeodomain Proteins / genetics
  • Humans
  • Infant, Low Birth Weight
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Models, Biological
  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic / complications
  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic / drug therapy
  • Short Stature Homeobox Protein
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Turner Syndrome / complications
  • Turner Syndrome / drug therapy

Substances

  • Homeodomain Proteins
  • SHOX protein, human
  • Short Stature Homeobox Protein
  • Growth Hormone